[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention) |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 00:20:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:10:25PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> Can it be renamed in the tarball to
>
> etc/gnumed/mime_type2file_extension.conf (no example)
This would make it appear as if it ought to get installed
unconditionally.
> and can the upstream source in cvs perhaps also lose the "example"
I'd rather advise to keep the .example and put it into
/usr/share/doc/gnumed/
> # should not be needed on debian
it may or may not be needed on Debian, depending on
whether people use certain types of bitmaps generated on
Windows within the document archive
If they do they should have a way to find out how (eg. by
browsing /usr/share/doc/gnumed/).
> proposed comment in-file:
>
> # should normally (as with other .conf) live in /etc/gnumed/
> # if not in the user .gnumed folder
It already says:
# This file can live in either or both of
#
# /etc/gnumed/
# for system wide configuration
# ~/.gnumed/
# for user specific configuration
#
# see also: http://wiki.gnumed.de/bin/view/Gnumed/ConfigFiles
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/13
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09