[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention)
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention) |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:35:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:49:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > And I'm actually not sure that your entry is correct
> > > because /etc/mime.types has
> > >
> > > image/x-ms-bmp bmp
>
> Can you find out which actual tool reported this?
I must assume it was pycommon/gmMimeMagic.py which is the
one obvious place where I now find image/x-bmp. That file
wasn't created by GNUmed, it was taken from the web. I have
corrected that apparent error.
> > I don't get what's so problematic about this.
>
> Something is wrong. Either the tool you are using which provides the
> mime tyoe or the mime.types definition. No application (be it GNUmed or
> something else) should be forced to fix this - it should work out of the
> box. If a Debian maintainer sees things like this and does not try to
> investigate into the problem Debian would become a bunch of workarounds
> which we try to avoid. It is not a problem from the GNUmed perspective -
> from Debian it is.
>
> I tried to seek
>
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/
>
> for bmp and it turned out that this mime type is not officially
> specified. So I wonder on what basis /etc/mime.typesdefined
> image/x-ms-bmp instead of just using image/x-bmp as "the tool" you was
> using.
See, and unless the world turns ideal tomorrow we'll be
better off keeping the GNUmed type to extension file around
-- it needn't be properly installed but it should at least
be available as an example under doc/gnumed/.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Naming convention (Was: Choice of programming language and project management), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/07
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/09
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention),
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/08
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Andreas Tille, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Karsten Hilbert, 2009/09/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: Packaging (Was: Naming convention), Jim Busser, 2009/09/09