[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT...
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT... |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:09:30 -0800 |
On 2010-01-28, at 2:20 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Come on, GNUmed is more powerful than that ?
>
> This is now legal in 0.7-to-be:
>
> $<name::%(title)s %(firstnames)s%(preferred)s%(lastnames)s::35>$
To use an automobile analogy, we know me to be somewhat "thick" with respect
to "looking under the hood" ... :-)
... which is my way of introducing to ask whether the above (title etc) needed
to each be specially-defined purely to assist the placeholders, or does the
above take advantage of these (are they properly termed variables) as maybe
already-defined in the "middleware"?
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Jim Busser, 2010/01/27
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT...,
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/28
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] BUG REPORT..., Karsten Hilbert, 2010/01/27