[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:03:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:44:10PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> about 1 month old
>
> or about 3 months old
>
> or about 6 months old
Well, so just enter a DOB which is
about 1 month
about 3 months
about 6 months
back in time ?? I mean, this should be acceptably hard to
establish, no ?
You can *still* set the .estimated flag.
> Now maybe some people (Liz?) will say it is important for
> "fake" dates of birth to be recognizably different from
> "real" dates of birth
They are. They have the .estimated flag set.
> 3) even when it is known in a praxis that a DOB is uncertain, there exists no
> routine way
> to communicate in a letter or report that the enclosed DOB is "fake"
> nor the degree of (in)accuracy in the estimate
In case .estimated is True any placeholder involving the DOB
will, of course, include the ~ sign.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Vaibhav Banait, 2012/01/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Busser, Jim, 2012/01/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Busser, Jim, 2012/01/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Liz, 2012/01/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/23
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/23
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Sebastian Hilbert, 2012/01/23
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/23
Re: [Gnumed-devel] estimated dob, Karsten Hilbert, 2012/01/23