[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Sign as, or Sign?
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Sign as, or Sign? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jun 2014 13:30:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:21:10AM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> At the risk of a triviality except it is so simple, the screenshot, can
>
> Sign as
>
> in future be changed to simply
>
> Sign
>
> as this avoids to create the hesitation whether such "signing" is only
> supposed to be done if the value is Abnormal or Relevant?
>
> In the case of a Hb of 119 (relative to a lower limit of normal of 120)
> whether I decide to mark it abnormal or leave it normal can be a separate
> decision from my accepting responsibility for the result. Which, in such
> cases, isn't even clear that the distinction is useful. (And could anyways be
> computed.)
>
> … removing the "as" does not adversely affect the capacity to flag those
> items where a clinician sees value to do so
I have slightly modified the layout.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
screenshot_001.png
Description: PNG image