[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: side projects and sub projects
From: |
Riccardo Mottola |
Subject: |
Re: side projects and sub projects |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Feb 2016 10:38:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 |
Hi,
Richard Frith-Macdonald ha scritto:
Lots of people want a GNUstep desktop environment
Some people want to produce native-feeling windows apps
Some people want to produce native-feeling gnome or kde apps
Some people want to be able to work with OSX tools but deploy on
Linux/unix/windows
Some people want to use the latest OSX APIs
Some people want to work on better new stuff than OSX
I guess what I'm struggling to identify are the major groups of GNUstep users
More precisely, I suppose, the groups of potential users; people who want to
use GNUstep but for whom it's not yet good enough.
Right, this list catures many wishes. I may add.
Some people need more Mac kits beyond foundatoin and AppKit (e.g. all
Core* kits or the System kits)
Some people want to have a cutting-edge free desktop environment
Some people want to have a desktop for small computers (Raspberry,
Letux... etc)
Some people want to have stuff looking nostalgic and revive NeXT as
close as possible
Some people want to write server applications
Some people want to use non-mainstream platforms (e.g. old computers, or
SPARC servers, or...)
Some people want to port one specific app and have it run in another
environment (windows, GNOME....)
Some people want to develop native Objective-C but use Free OS instead
of Mac (e.g. students or purists)
Some items in these lists are specific projects.
Some however are perhaps just different views of our core stuff.
If you say "advanced api".. if somebody is working on adding Mac
methods, but it make spart of our main project to add them. Perhaps they
can be staged in a fork, but then slowly merged in as stabilized.
It is important not to give a "fragmented" impression of GNUstep: we are
capable of many things and we can support other more varied projects.
Riccardo
Re: side projects and sub projects, Stefan Bidigaray, 2016/02/27
Re: side projects and sub projects, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2016/02/28
Re: side projects and sub projects, Riccardo Mottola, 2016/02/28