[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: gpsd | Proposal: Usage of official GNSSids in cgps.c (#199)
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: gpsd | Proposal: Usage of official GNSSids in cgps.c (#199) |
Date: |
Sun, 08 May 2022 07:53:30 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (berkeley-unix) |
"Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com> writes:
> The following tables shows the different systems and currently used
> short char ids. Is it possible to switch to either 3-char ids or if
> that is too long, using the 1-char codes for the GNSSs.
>
> | Name | 3-char | GPSd 2-char | 1-char
> | GPS | GPS | GP | G
> | GLONASS | GLO | GL | R
> | GALILEO | GAL | GA | E
> | BeiDou | BDS | BD | C
> | QZSS | QZS | QZ | J
> | SBAS | SBS | SB | S
> | IRNSS | IRN | IR | I
> | IMES | | I | M
So it turns out ^C^C in an email buffer doesn't straighten out the
org-mode table....
I'm not entirely clear on what's a real standard vs common, but
for 1-char abbrevs I find G/R/E/C obvious. S less so, but now I know,
and I would have guessed J and I. IMES I didn't even know what it is,
but that's ok.
The 3-char abbrevs look entirely normal to me.
So if the 3-char fit, that seems good, and if that's at all awkward then
the 1-char is fine.