[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gpsd | Proposal: Usage of official GNSSids in cgps.c (#199)
|
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
|
Subject: |
Re: gpsd | Proposal: Usage of official GNSSids in cgps.c (#199) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 8 May 2022 11:54:05 -0700 |
Yo Greg!
On Sun, 08 May 2022 07:53:30 -0400
Greg Troxel <gdt@lexort.com> wrote:
> So it turns out ^C^C in an email buffer doesn't straighten out the
> org-mode table....
That would have to do with your email reader...
> I'm not entirely clear on what's a real standard vs common, but
Nothing, yet. Well, there are a lot of standards, they just don't
agree. Plus the GNSS vendors that dod their own, wiating for the
standards to catch up.
> for 1-char abbrevs I find G/R/E/C obvious. S less so, but now I
> know, and I would have guessed J and I. IMES I didn't even know what
> it is, but that's ok.
IMES is indoor psuedo GPS! Used inside shopping malls, etc.
> The 3-char abbrevs look entirely normal to me.
Except cgps uses the 2 char, no room for the 3 char.
> So if the 3-char fit, that seems good, and if that's at all awkward
> then the 1-char is fine.
3 does not fit.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpObtRM4cBTp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature