Re: (off topic?) Docbook? Re: manlint?

[Marc Chantreux]

hello,

> Then you only had a very superficial look at DocBook.

i was switching from plain texts to html and using my own classnames
in span, div and p tags to have my own semantic. having a standard
way to do it really helped but i'll probably be much more demanding
nowadays.

>   https://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20190419101505

thanks for the link. i postpone the reading to friday so i can read
it correctly.

> But the many specific ways in which DocBook is ill-designed
> are much worse than the fact that it uses XML.

:)

> there is no need to do that work because both the roff(7)
> and the TeX markup language frameworks are clearly superior
> to XML.

agree with that. i really was thinking about the semantic but
i have to admit i don't even remember how to set a title in
docbook.

also: thanks for the very informative answers you gave to my questions.
i have nothing left to comment or ask anymore.

cheers,
marc