[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:22:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 04:51:43PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> You may want to use 4 byte alignment too. It's a good thing to align
> 32-bit addresses in the ELF headers.
Ok, but we aren't doing it on i386-pc, and this never caused trouble. The
ELF headers in our modules are only loaded by GRUB itself, and if our
loader can cope with unaligned addresses, why bother trying to align
them?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- [PATCH] i386-qemu port, Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/21
- Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21
- [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)),
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] define GRUB_MOD_ALIGN to 0 on non-ieee1275 (Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port)), Robert Millan, 2009/06/22
- Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
- Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko, 2009/06/22
- Re: does module area require alignment? (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Pavel Roskin, 2009/06/22
[PATCH] move grub_stop() (Re: [PATCH] i386-qemu port), Robert Millan, 2009/06/21