[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Should we distribute libltdl?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Should we distribute libltdl? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:09:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
we currently distribute a copy of libltdl as part of guile-core and
install it when libltdl is not already found in the system.
I think this is wrong since libltdl belongs to libtool and should be
installed by libtool and not by any number of programs that use it.
We do not distribute libgmp although we rely on it and we shouldn't
distribute libltdl although we rely on it.
I had the concrete problem that I couldn't do a "make distcheck"
without prior "make install" on a system where in fact libltdl was not
available. But even if this is due to some bugs in the way that we
use libltdl, I think we should just treat libltdl as any other
external library.
It makes installing Guile slightly harder, but the behavior of Guile
is in fact simpler.
Opinions?
(I have committed the removal of libltdl already.)
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Should we distribute libltdl?,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, rm, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, tomas, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Rob Browning, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08