[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Should we distribute libltdl? |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:08:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> Can't guile distribute libltdl but only use
> it iff there's no local version found (or if the user states her
> intention by configure magic)?
That is how it works right now. I am not happy about the fact that
Guile does this silently and that it is a configure decision that
persists in the build tree.
What I would be happy with is to include a copy of libltdl in the
Guile distribution but to have it completely ignored by configure and
the Makefiles. When libltdl is not found in the system, a message
could be printed that instructs the user to install libltdl, maybe by
using the included sources.
- Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, rm, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, tomas, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Rob Browning, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08