[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: Should we distribute libltdl? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 17:57:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> writes:
> A big question is the ease of installation for those using OS package
> systems vs those doing things by hand. My view is that the really big
> issue is making things
> a) easy to package
> and
> b) easy to use once packaged
Those two things would benefit when Guile explicitely declares as a
external dependency. The Right Thing for a Guile OS package such as a
.deb or .rpm is not to contain libltdl but to depend on the package
that contains libltdl.
> Here's the guile control file for pkgsrc. But it seems to link in the
> special guile ltldl:
Yes, in the 1.6 series we use our own version of libltdl. This is no
longer the case.
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, (continued)
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/07
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, rm, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, tomas, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Rob Browning, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?,
Marius Vollmer <=