[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Should we distribute libltdl? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 11:45:54 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
> Those two things would benefit when Guile explicitely declares as a
> external dependency. The Right Thing for a Guile OS package such as a
> .deb or .rpm is not to contain libltdl but to depend on the package
> that contains libltdl.
For the record, now that we don't need customizations, I don't have
any problem with dropping our copy of libltdl. Alhough I agree that
it would be good to have a clear configure error message when libltdl
is not detected.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, (continued)
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Bruce Korb, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, rm, 2005/03/08
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Marius Vollmer, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, tomas, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Rob Browning, 2005/03/09
- Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08
Re: Should we distribute libltdl?, Greg Troxel, 2005/03/08