[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:51:53 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> FWIW, my feeling about R6 as a whole is that it is not aligned with
>> Guile's objective - remembering that the latter is not just to be a
>> Scheme implementation, but a Scheme implementation in the form of an
>> embeddable library that is useful for extending applications. But my
>> thoughts on this haven't fully crystallised yet.
>
> Speaking of this, I hope you (Guile developers) don't mind my answer to
> Marc Feeley wrt. R6RS, which he posted on `r6rs-discuss' [0]. We
> haven't had a debate about it here, but I'd be glad if we had one.
Well I didn't mind. I was happy to see that Marc had received a
statement from "Guile", and I'm happy with what you said.
> BTW, as time passes, I am more and more doubtful about the "embeddable
> library" argument. After all, if we work on a Scheme implementation,
> that's certainly because we want to write Scheme. Sure we want to make
> it easy to interface with existing code written in C, but we also want
> to write *more* Scheme code.
^ Agreed up to here...
> With that goal in mind, the pure
> interpreter approach is not sustainable
... but I don't see what you mean by this.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/28
- Message not available
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/28
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/29
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS,
Neil Jerram <=
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Julian Graham, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Julian Graham, 2007/10/31
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/31
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Neil Jerram, 2007/10/30
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/10/31
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Andy Wingo, 2007/10/30
Re: [r6rs-discuss] Implementors' intentions concerning R6RS, Elf, 2007/10/29