Re: [PATCH] Revise GC asserts.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:

> If this is our stance, this looks like a good opportunity to take all
> these variable private, and have people use gc-stats to get the data.
>
> Providing direct access to variables is problematic from an API stability
> point of view.

I agree.  I'll support you if you take this route.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo'.