[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: r6rs incompatibilities
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: r6rs incompatibilities |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2010 13:24:29 -0400 |
Hi Mike,
> What happens with this patch if the file only contains the four
> characters "#!r6" followed by EOF? Does it behave appropriately
> after calling scm_ungetc on EOF? (I guess that would make it an
> unterminated hash bang comment.)
If the fifth character is EOF instead of 'r', control is handed to
scm_read_scsh_block_comment (after ungetting EOF), which raises the
appropriate unterminated comment error.
Regards,
Julian
- r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/21
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/21
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Mike Gran, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities,
Julian Graham <=
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/27