[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
From: |
Mark H Weaver |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default
> for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal.
FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In
the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a
recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW, with thread
support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it seems to work
reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems and passes much of
the test suite.
Mark
- Re: [PATCH] Implement open-process and related functions on MinGW, (continued)
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Neil Jerram, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/22
- Re: MinGW patches, Mark H Weaver, 2014/02/23
- Re: MinGW patches, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/23
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile,
Mark H Weaver <=
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/02/19
- Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Ludovic Courtès, 2014/02/18
- Re: Signal delivery, Doug Evans, 2014/02/18