[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:01:10 +0300 |
> From: Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès), address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:43:34 +0200
>
> > @@ -659,7 +663,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_kill, "kill", 2, 0, 0,
> > #else
> > /* Mingw has raise(), but not kill(). (Other raw DOS environments might
> > be similar.) Use raise() when the requested pid is our own process,
> > - otherwise bomb. */
> > + otherwise TerminateProcess. */
> > if (scm_to_int (pid) == getpid ())
> > {
> > if (raise (scm_to_int (sig)) != 0)
> > @@ -673,6 +677,10 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_kill, "kill", 2, 0, 0,
> > goto err;
> > }
> > }
> > +#ifdef __MINGW32__
> > + if (w32_kill_proc (scm_to_int (pid), scm_to_int (sig)) != 0)
> > + SCM_SYSERROR;
> > +#endif /* __MINGW32__ */
> > #endif
> > return SCM_UNSPECIFIED;
> > }
>
> Here we effectively have two mingw blocks. Can the previous one be
> removed?
The previous block is not MinGW-specific. It allows any system that
has 'raise' (which is Standard C, so should be available everywhere)
to at least kill the current process. This code was there before my
changes, and I saw no reasons to remove it.
> If not, let's fold it into `w32_kill_proc', and in any case
> let's rename `w32_kill_proc' to `kill', and then define HAVE_KILL.
I didn't want to call the function 'kill', as some other linked-in
library might have it, and then you'd have a clash. 'kill' is too
simple a name to overload.
> > @@ -1141,7 +1143,7 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_execl, "execl", 1, 0, 1,
> >
> > exec_argv = scm_i_allocate_string_pointers (args);
> >
> > - execv (exec_file, exec_argv);
> > + execv (exec_file, (char const * const *)exec_argv);
> > SCM_SYSERROR;
> >
> > /* not reached. */
>
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/wingo/src/guile-2.0/libguile'
> CC libguile_2.0_la-posix.lo
> posix.c: In function 'scm_execl':
> posix.c:1146:21: warning: passing argument 2 of 'execv' from incompatible
> pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> execv (exec_file, (char const * const *)exec_argv);
> ^
> In file included from ../lib/unistd.h:40:0,
> from posix.c:50:
> /home/wingo/.guix-profile/include/unistd.h:566:12: note: expected 'char *
> const*' but argument is of type 'const char * const*'
> extern int execv (const char *__path, char *const __argv[])
> ^~~~~
>
> What should be done here?
Make the cast MinGW-only?
> > @@ -1408,16 +1433,16 @@ scm_open_process (SCM mode, SCM prog, SCM args)
> > if (err > 0)
> > {
> > char *msg = strerror (errno);
> > - fprintf (fdopen (err, "a"), "In execlp of %s: %s\n",
> > + fprintf (fdopen (err, "a"), "In execvp of %s: %s\n",
> > exec_file, msg);
> > }
> >
> > _exit (EXIT_FAILURE);
> > +#endif /* HAVE_FORK */
> > /* Not reached. */
> > return SCM_BOOL_F;
> > }
> > #undef FUNC_NAME
> > -#endif /* HAVE_FORK */
>
> This change updates to provide `open-process' effectively on all systems
> instead of only if `fork' is available, but then it causes a runtime
> error if the system doesn't have `fork' and isn't `mingw32'.
Sorry, I don't follow: the change in fprintf fixes a simple type (the
function whose call failed is 'execvp', not 'execlp'. Or are you
talking about something else?
> I guess that's OK in practice. Would you mind updating the
> documentation in doc/ref/posix.texi to indicate this? Thanks.
Once I understand the issue, sure.
Thanks.
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, (continued)
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/24
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/24
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Andy Wingo, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows, Andy Wingo, 2016/06/25
- Re: Support open-process and friends on MS-Windows,
Eli Zaretskii <=