[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SCM_LENGTH ???
From: |
Kevin Ryde |
Subject: |
Re: SCM_LENGTH ??? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:40:26 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> The recommended way in 1.6 is to use
> SCM_STRING_LENGTH, for example. It _is_ annoying to have to switch
> away from SCM_STRING_LENGTH in 1.8 again,
Speaking of SCM_STRING_LENGTH, things like that which have been macros
in the past should remain as macros, not functions, even if all it
does is a function call.
Changing from macro to function for instance broke guile-gtk. It was
#ifdef testing for SCM_STRING_LENGTH to know to use that (in 1.6), as
opposed to SCM_LENGTH (in whatever dim dark past).
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/07
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Greg Troxel, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/11
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???,
Kevin Ryde <=
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/12
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Ken Raeburn, 2005/01/10
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Bruce Korb, 2005/01/11
- Re: SCM_LENGTH ???, Marius Vollmer, 2005/01/11