Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

[Pierre Neidhardt]

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Are there additional benefits to 'emacs-lucid' that are not already
> addressed by 'emacs-no-x-toolkit'?  I'm not necessarily opposed to
> adding another Emacs variant, but I don't yet understand the motivation.

Does EXWM run on emacs-no-x-toolkit?

-- 
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature