Re: Cabal mismatch in ghc-lucid; long-term archiving Haskell?

[Lars-Dominik Braun]

Hi zimoun,

> Maybe it could be better to move the ’cabal-revision’ from the
> ’arguments’ field to the ’origin’ field.
> Perhaps, we could have a ’cabal-revision’ procedure returning a G-exp
> and put it under the ’snippet’ field.
> WDYT?
it would be awesome to have that functionality and I agree that a
“combining” origin putting the .cabal file in the right spot would
be ideal. Not sure how to build that though, any ideas?

> That’s said, it is a core-updates change because it requires to modify
> the Haskell build-system and, a rough estimate about the number of
> impacted packages:
There’s a branch wip-haskell waiting to be worked on.

Lars