[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update on automating testing of patches and qa.guix.gnu.org
From: |
Christopher Baines |
Subject: |
Re: Update on automating testing of patches and qa.guix.gnu.org |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 10:36:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.9; emacs 28.1 |
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks! Really cool.
>
> On sam., 05 nov. 2022 at 12:24, Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> wrote:
>
>> - The creation of the patch branches is now handled here (rather than
>> through scripts run by Laminar)
>
> Is it possible to have access to the branch? As discussed with Josselin
> at 10 Years Days, we could have in mind the workflow:
>
> guix time-machine --url=https://qa.guix.gnu.org \
> --branch=58812 \
> -- shell --symlink
>
> for quickly testing a specific patch without going to manually clone,
> apply the patch, then run ./bootstrap, ./configure and last use
> ./pre-inst-env.
For the Git branches, there's Gitolite+cgit+some other stuff setup here
https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/git/guix-patches
So yes, this command should work (obviously, disabling authentication
isn't good):
guix time-machine \
--url=https://git.guix-patches.cbaines.net/git/guix-patches \
--branch=issue-58812 --disable-authentication -- shell --symlink
Eventually I'd like to move this off of a machine I'm paying for, plus
move it on to a .guix domain. Also, even though the channel instance for
some branches might have been built by the data.qa.guix.gnu.org Guix
Data Service, this isn't done in a way that substitutes are available,
so that's not ideal.
>> I'm finding this really useful to highlight simple patches which have
>> had some testing done automatically. I'd encourage others who are
>> interested in merging patches to try looking at the patches showing up
>> as green, as hopefully they're in a good state.
>
> Do you expose the list of these green patches? It could be cool to have
> a command line – an option of “guix weather” or a specific CLI – to
> collect information of the status. WDYT?
I'm using this list here https://qa.guix.gnu.org/patches and just
looking at the ones at the top with the green circle by them.
An API endpoint could easily be added though if that's useful.
>> If there's any which
>> aren't (e.g. needs some changes or more discussion), you can mark it as
>> moreinfo to push it down the list (there's a link on the right to do
>> this).
>
> Mark it as ’moreinfo’ via Debbugs? Or something else?
Yep. I'm currently trying to keep the qa-frontpage relatively stateless,
so it's just reading the tags in debbugs.
Thanks,
Chris
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature