Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Hi Felix,

Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 8:53 AM Maxim Cournoyer
> <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In the future, try to remember using the --subject-prefix='PATCH
>> core-updates', to avoid committers mistakenly pushing this to master
>
> Thank you for your response! I wrote for guidance on that issue. I am
> sorry that was unclear from my message.
>
> With the core-updates process now abandoned, I retitled the issue to

Could you share the reference of that?  I'm not against it, but our
currently documented process still mention the good old staging and
core-updates branches.

>     "[PATCH wip-inetutils 0/4] gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4".
>
> Does that work for you?
>
> I am happy to retitle as "core-updates" as you suggested, if that's
> what you want. Of course, you can also retitle it in any way you think
> is best.

Until everybody has a good grasp of the new process, I think sticking to
the documented one may be best for now, as it makes it clear that this
cause a mass rebuild and shouldn't land to master.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim