[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.
From: |
Felix Lechner |
Subject: |
Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4. |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:43:48 -0700 |
Hi Maxim,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:11 PM Maxim Cournoyer
<maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Until everybody has a good grasp of the new process, I think sticking to
> the documented one may be best for now
The bug was retitled 'core-updates' per your request. [1]
I didn't mean to set a tone in the discussion and merely hoped to
embrace—by mistake it turns out—an existing consensus. My apologies!
May this action please invite further dialog, as needed.
Kind regards
Felix Lechner
[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/62154
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., (continued)
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/14
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Leo Famulari, 2023/03/14
- Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/14
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Efraim Flashner, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process, Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process, Andreas Enge, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Leo Famulari, 2023/03/15
- Re: Branch and release process (was: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.), Christopher Baines, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Andreas Enge, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/15
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4.,
Felix Lechner <=
- Re: gnu: inetutils: Update to 2.4., Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/03/17