Re: Process for reviewing patches as someone without commit access

[Simon Tournier]

Hi,

There are only two hard things in Computer Science…

On Thu, 07 Sep 2023 at 09:19, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote:

>>> Discussing about idea, would it be possible that the QA infrastructure
>>> automatically send a message to Debbugs for tagging?  For example, the
>>> usertag ’qa-ok’ or whatever other meaningful name. :-)
>>
>> +1 for that as well, maybe 'qa-passed'.

…naming and…

> The only concern is that it is maintaining QA information in multiple
> places, the QA service itself, and trying to mirror it to the bug
> tracker...

…cache invalidation. :-)


> QA might fail with a later patch iterations, so it should also then go
> and remove the qa-passed tag? Should it remove the tag when QA is
> currently in an unknown state?

That’s good questions.  Yeah, maybe QA could check when starting to
build that there is no ’qa-passed’ or remove it if any.

Cheers,
simon