[bug#54780] [PATCH] gnu: lttng-ust: Fix dependencies.

[Olivier Dion]

On Fri, 08 Apr 2022, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
> Olivier Dion schreef op vr 08-04-2022 om 10:28 [-0400]:
>>  and don't fully understand it.
>
> lttn-ust probably has some header
> /gnu/store/...-lttng-unst-VERSION/include/lttng.h or the like.
> It would look something like:
>
>   [...]
>   #include <liburcu.h>
>   int lttng_foo(urcu_stuff *bar);
>   [..]
>
> Then the 'patch-header-inclusion' phase detects the #include
> <liburcu.h>, looks for include/liburcu.h in the package inputs, and
> finds /gnu/store/...-liburcu-VERSION/include/liburcu.h.  It then
> replaces liburcu.h by /gnu/store/...-liburcu-VERSION/include/liburcu.h:
>
>   [...]
>   #include </gnu/store/.../include/liburcu.h>
>   int lttng_foo(urcu_stuff *bar);
>   [...]
>
> Now, suppose I build an application dependning on lttng-ust.  Then the
> C compiler will ‘include’ 'lttng.h' in the {CROSS_,}C_INLUDE_PATH. 
> Then it sees:
>
>   #include </gnu/store/.../include/liburcu.h>
>
> Now, as this is an absolute /gnu/store/... file name, the compiler
> knows where to find it without looking into {CROSS_,}C_INCLUDE_PATH, so
> it will find the header even though it might not be in
> {CROSS_,}C_INCLUDE_PATH.
>
> It's the same system as doing some 'substitute*' to bake in the
> absolute file name of some executable into the compiled application to
> avoid relying on PATH, except applied to C headers instead of
> executables and {CROSS_,}C_CINCLUDE_PATH instead of PATH.

Okay cool!  Thanks for the details.  I will change my patch with your
substitute.

-- 
Olivier Dion
oldiob.dev