Re: member with constructor not allowed in union

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony DeRobertis <address@hidden> writes:

Anthony> On Tuesday, March 19, 2002, at 01:21 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:

>> First, somebody implemented a dynamic C stack, which was probably
>> OK on early C++ compilers that did not detect the C++
>> union-non-trivial constructor prohibition. And then when people
>> upgrade their C++ compilers,

Anthony> No, the implementation of the dynamic C stack
Anthony> changed. Earlier versions of bison compile fine with, e.g.,
Anthony> gcc 3. Newer versions don't. http://bugs.debian.org/130914
Anthony> contains all the details.

Yes, we agree.  Hans is mistaken.  Please, let's stop this.