Re: member with constructor not allowed in union

[Hans Aberg]

At 17:42 +0100 2002/03/19, Akim Demaille wrote:
>Another good idea is C++ users using this CVS Bison.  As noted by
>Hans, I want some tests first.  There are a couple of issues to fix
>(for instance we still output #define, although enum are now easy to
>output (Robert, would you handle this bit please?), and then, I plan
>to give it a shot on some other projects than ours (e.g., GiNaC0, then
>make a prerelease, and ask for opinions.
>
>
>But people should understand that we _need_ input.  Do not wait for an
>official release to realize it does not fulfill your needs!

I picked it down and noticed that one needs to run it through m4 in order
to get it working. (Have you thought of integrating m4 or some such macro
program with Bison. :-))

-- bison.hairy does not work and is not documented, so I do not see why it
should be dangerous to put in bison.c++ in the distribution as well as an
undocumented feature.

  Hans Aberg