[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union
From: |
Christian Bauer |
Subject: |
Re: member with constructor not allowed in union |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:12:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:55:33PM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> Hmm, AFAICT, YYSTYPE is int and always has been...
Actually, it is "ex" in our case.
Bye,
Christian
--
/ Coding on PowerPC and proud of it
\/ http://www.uni-mainz.de/~bauec002/
- member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/13
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/13
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/14
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/15
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union,
Christian Bauer <=
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Richard B. Kreckel, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/18
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Anthony DeRobertis, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/19
- Re: member with constructor not allowed in union, Hans Aberg, 2002/03/19