Re: member with constructor not allowed in union

[Akim Demaille]

>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:

Hans> At 11:31 +0100 2002/03/18, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> It seems we are not done yet with the C++ issues.
>> 
>> The problem this time is that we have to throw away your union
>> trick to compute the alignments.  We cannot afford to put YYSTYPE
>> (and actually YYLTYPE) into a union, as it makes it impossible for
>> C++ users to use any useful structure in it.

Hans> I think that if you now have a C++ skeleton file, that should be
Hans> put into the ordinary distribution. Those that want a C++ output
Hans> should use that one, not compile the C output as C++.

No.  Use CVS.


Hans> As for the C output only feature, I think one may need two
Hans> skeleton files: One with a purely stack produces an overflow,
Hans> and one purely dynamic. This is more memory efficient. But that
Hans> could be made later at some point (with the C++ skeleton file in
Hans> hand, there is no need for rush).

I don't think anybody cares.  If one does, she simply has to adjust
the YYSTACK parameters, period.  I have no intention to augment the
maintenance burden.