[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc compile-time performance
From: |
Robert Dewar |
Subject: |
Re: gcc compile-time performance |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2002 20:45:51 -0400 (EDT) |
<<GNAT's real advantage, in fact, is not so much in good error RECOVERY,
as in good error DIAGNOSIS: its messages are MUCH better than the
usual GCC standard. Panic-mode error recovery is never going to give
you that.
>>
Of course the two go hand in hand if you want to give more than *one*
"much better" error message, and a lot of effort also goes into ereror
recovery in GNAT.
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, (continued)
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Hans Aberg, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance,
Robert Dewar <=
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20