[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gcc compile-time performance
From: |
Robert Dewar |
Subject: |
Re: gcc compile-time performance |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2002 21:26:16 -0400 (EDT) |
<<The problem in C++ is that if one say mistypes say a class name in its
definition, a lot of subsequent code becomes meaningless to the compiler to
catch: The context information that it is a class name is lost. Catching a
missed "}" is a relatively simple problem to that as the meaning of "{"
does not change with context (like the language type that a name belongs
to).
>>
Certainly one should do nearest spelling error correction in such cases, that
can definitely help.
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, (continued)
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20
- Re: gcc compile-time performance,
Robert Dewar <=
- Re: gcc compile-time performance, Robert Dewar, 2002/05/20