Re: Help with shift/reduce conflict

[Soumitra Kumar]

1+3.YYID(7) has no meaning. But following is a valid
expression:
(YYID + YYID).YYID().YYID () + YYID() + YYID.YYID() +
YYID.YYID

-Soumitra.

--- Henrik Sorensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> can you tell a bit more about what your grammar
> tries to achieve ?
> from your very brief description, it sounds like you
> can do this:
>       1+3.YYID(7)
> but what would this mean ?
> Henrik
> 
> On Sunday 27 March 2005 21.37, Soumitra Kumar wrote:
> > %token YYID
> > %%
> > expression : hier_id
> >
> >         | method_call
> >
> >           /* unary and secondary expression
> follows.
> > */
> >         ;
> > method_call : expression '.' YYID '(' expression
> ')'
> >         ;
> > hier_id : YYID
> >
> >         | hier_id '.' YYID
> >
> >         ;
> >
> > How to resolve the shift/reduce conflict? Please
> help.
> >
> > -Soumitra.
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources
> site!
> > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
> 


                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/