Re: %destructor feedback

[Joel E. Denny]

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Frank Heckenbach wrote:

> Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> > Maybe that does not deserve that much attention: it seems pretty weird
> > not to use a value.  A warning seems a better feature.
>
> I sometimes attach some kinds of flags (integer type) to some
> symbols that I need in some, but not all, rules that use that
> symbol. So, if you go for the warning, could you please make it
> optional? (I think it would be a useful feature in general,
> including several of my grammars, but in some cases I'd probably
> prefer to turn it off.)

If your semantic value is just an integer, then you probably won't declare 
a destructor.  In that case, I should think there's no reason for bison to 
generate a warning.  Would that resolve your issue?

Joel