[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?
From: |
Arno Wilhelm |
Subject: |
Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:46:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929) |
You might want to post a question about cleaning up the strings, to see
if you get a reply from some of those using C. Bison has a feature
%destructor, that can be used to clean up the stuff in the case of
errors. In other case, it must be cleaned up in the actions, I think.
That's a good point. I used strdup() in the flex file:
{WORD} { yylval.str = strdup( yytext ); return WORD; }
But I get a memory leak even when I free the the in the bison file like this:
WORD EQUAL WORD { $$ = !strncmp( $1, $3, 128 ); free( yylval.str );
}
I do not get an error message when compiling but valgrind shows me a leak in
the strdup() function:
> valgrind --leak-check=full rules
...
...
==935== 3 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 3
==935== at 0x401B46D: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:149)
==935== by 0x40D1B9F: strdup (in /lib/tls/libc-2.3.6.so)
==935== by 0x8048976: yylex (in /RulezParser/flex_bison_test/rules)
==935== by 0x804990E: yyparse (in /RulezParser/flex_bison_test/rules)
==935== by 0x804A498: main (in /RulezParser/flex_bison_test/rules)
...
Guess I search the archives and consult the manual before I post a question
about this issue -
except somebody here on this list can give me a hint ;-)
thanks,
arno
- Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Arno Wilhelm, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Hans Aberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Arno Wilhelm, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Hans Aberg, 2006/04/18
- Message not available
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Hans Aberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?,
Arno Wilhelm <=
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Arno Wilhelm, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Hans Aberg, 2006/04/18
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Arno Wilhelm, 2006/04/19
- Re: Different behaviour with string and number tokens ?, Hans Aberg, 2006/04/19