Re: Reducing conflict: Was: Exceeded limits of %dprec/%merge?

[Joel E. Denny]

On Fri, 19 May 2006, Satya Kiran wrote:

> Sorry for a small digression, but are we moving toward implementing
> probablistic CFGs in bison? or is my understanding very oblique..
> thanks!

So far, I think we're just talking about how a Bison user might implement 
this (and other things) himself using semantic actions, %merge, and 
perhaps a few new features.  I like to keep features general and reusable 
as much as possible.  Direct support for weighted grammars is far beyond 
my current interests.  Maybe someone else on the list is interested.

Joel