[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reducing conflict: Was: Exceeded limits of %dprec/%merge?
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: Reducing conflict: Was: Exceeded limits of %dprec/%merge? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 22:16:44 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006, Derek M Jones wrote:
>
> > On the subject of new features. I have just been bitten (again)
> > by not being able to execute any actions in when multiple parse
> > stacks are in existence. Having a way of specifying a non-deferred
> > action would solve a recurring problem of mine.
>
> I'm envisioning the conflict actions we discussed always executing
> immediately.
>
> Other than that, I have to say I'm currently not so interested in this.
> Maybe someone else is.
Well, just for kicks, what do you want your nondeferred actions to do?
Joel