[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Growing stacks in C++
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Growing stacks in C++ |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:02:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 |
On 07/23/10 01:02, Hans Aberg wrote:
> I recall Paul wrote the C skeleton, and one reason for not supporting
> compile as C++ is that he did not want to work with C++, in
> addition to being complicated somehow.
Although I contributed to the C skeleton, I am not its original author;
I believe that honor (or dishonor) belongs to Robert Corbett.
But you're right that I run screaming away whenever C++ is mentioned.
>From my (admittedly distant) point of view, every time C++ comes up,
its standard seems to have mutated in some even-more-complex way.
I would prefer someone else to be the C++ expert here, just as I
prefer someone else to be expert in PHP, Cobol, and JCL.
- Growing stacks in C++, Paul Hilfinger, 2010/07/22
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Hans Aberg, 2010/07/22
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Paul Hilfinger, 2010/07/24
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Hans Aberg, 2010/07/22
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Paul Hilfinger, 2010/07/24
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Hans Aberg, 2010/07/22
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Paul Hilfinger, 2010/07/24
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Hans Aberg, 2010/07/23
- Re: Growing stacks in C++,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Hans Aberg, 2010/07/23
- Re: Growing stacks in C++, Akim Demaille, 2010/07/27