Mike Aubury wrote:
I'm thinking your grammar is probably wrong - there shouldn't be any
problem with having lots of packets like that - so long and they are
not very recursive (packet within packet within packet .....)
What does your grammar look like ?
@Mike: Sorry for sending my first reply to you and not to the list. So
here is my mail to the list.
Hi,
thank you for your fast reply. I think I found the mistake now -- I
guess it's the 'stream' rule.
The beginning of my grammar is like:
stream: /* empty line */
| stmt stream
| error stream
;