RE: ReturnsZero(): command does not return zero. Is classcreatedwith value of false?

[Villalovos, John L]

> Has anything happened on this issue?
> 
> I just upgraded from 2.0.7p3 to 2.1.5 and now my ReturnsZero
> statements don't seem to work anymore :(
> 
> 
>     groups:
> 
>         # The web server is called httpd in Red Hat 8.0 forward
>         hasWebServer_rh8 = ( ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd) )
>         # The web server is called apache in Red Hat 7.x
>         hasWebServer_rh7 = ( ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet apache) )
>         # See if phpMyAdmin is installed
>         has_phpMyAdmin = ( ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet
> phpMyAdmin) ) 
> 
>     shellcommands:
> 
>         webServer.redhat_7.!hasWebServer_rh7::
>             "/usr/sbin/up2date apache"
>             "/sbin/chkconfig httpd on"
>             "/sbin/service httpd start"
> 
>         webServer.redhat_8.!hasWebServer_rh8::
>             "/usr/sbin/up2date httpd"
>             "/sbin/chkconfig httpd on"
>             "/sbin/service httpd start"
> 
>         # Install phpMyAdmin if a phpMyAdmin server
>         phpMyAdminServer.!has_phpMyAdmin::
>             "/usr/sbin/up2date phpMyAdmin"
> 
> 
> After upgrading to 2.1.5, none of my ReturnsZero commands are working.
> The classes are not being created.

I played around with this some more and ran cfagent -d0 -v and found the
following:

RVAL-FUNCTION ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd)
HandleFunctionObject(ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd))
IsBuiltinFunction(ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd))
IsBuiltinFunction: ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd)
ExpandVarstring(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd)
HandleFunction: ReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd)
HandleReturnsZero(/bin/rpm -q --quiet httpd)
cfengine:: Wait for child failed
ExpandVarstring(XX_CF_opposite_any_XX)
HandleGroupRVal(XX_CF_opposite_any_XX) group (hasWebServer_rh8), type=0
[No match of class XX_CF_opposite_any_XX]

So does anyone know why cfengine would have "Wait for child failed"?
This did NOT happen in 2.0.7.  Did the exec code get changed?

Thanks,
John 

-- 
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?