[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux ACLs
From: |
Mark . Burgess |
Subject: |
Re: Linux ACLs |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:51:49 +0200 (MEST) |
On 26 Oct, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Sven Mueller <sm@leogic.com> [2004.10.26.2229 +0200]:
>> From what a former colleague (a programmer) told me, Linux filesystem
>> ACLs should be pretty easy to use as they are (as he told me) pretty
>> much the same as POSIX filesystem ACLs. You said that they are totally
>> different, so I assumed that you looked at something different.
>
> Mark wanted something similar to Solaris ACLs, which are probably
> already implemented. POSIX ACLs are different.
>
SOlaris ACLs *are* POSIX ACLs. The first and reference implementation.
>> I think that those (posixacl.h and xattr.h) are in fact the
>> currently used API for ACLs and EAs. IANAP though (i am not
>> a programmer).
>
> There is libacl1... it's much preferable to code against
> a user-space library than the kernel.
>
Any references to data?
M
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Work: +47 22453272 Email: Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no
Fax : +47 22453205 WWW : http://www.iu.hio.no/~mark
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Wil Cooley, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs,
Mark . Burgess <=
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/27
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, John Valdes, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, John Valdes, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/27