[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Linux ACLs
From: |
martin f krafft |
Subject: |
Re: Linux ACLs |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:17:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
also sprach Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no <Mark.Burgess@iu.hio.no> [2004.10.26.2307
+0200]:
> All I observe is radically different APIs. The solaris api is very
> simple and logical, the linux one is huge and difficult to
> understand.
Maybe libacl...
PS: I would appreciate not being CC'd on replies... M-F-T is set.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
spamtraps: madduck.bogus@madduck.net
this space intentionally left blank.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Wil Cooley, 2004/10/26
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Sven Mueller, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, martin f krafft, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs,
martin f krafft <=
- Message not available
- Re: Linux ACLs, Philippe, 2004/10/27
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, John Valdes, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, John Valdes, 2004/10/26
- Re: Linux ACLs, Mark . Burgess, 2004/10/27