[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs's popularity
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs's popularity |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:58:24 +0100 |
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:34, Phil Carmody
<thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> In which case, why shouldn't we emacs proponents look on them with a sense
> of shame? More than 3 times slower - is that not shameful?
No, because Emacs is not optimized for that kind of use pattern.
Juanma
- Re: Emacs's popularity, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/15
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Lennart Borgman, 2008/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/15
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Lennart Borgman, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Charles philip Chan, 2008/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Paul R, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Andrea Vettorello, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16