[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs's popularity
From: |
Phil Carmody |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs's popularity |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:36:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
"Juanma Barranquero" <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:34, Phil Carmody
> <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> In which case, why shouldn't we emacs proponents look on them with a sense
>> of shame? More than 3 times slower - is that not shameful?
>
> No, because Emacs is not optimized for that kind of use pattern.
Opening files?
Phil
--
I tried the Vista speech recognition by running the tutorial. I was
amazed, it was awesome, recognised every word I said. Then I said the
wrong word ... and it typed the right one. It was actually just
detecting a sound and printing the expected word! -- pbhj on /.
- Re: Emacs's popularity, (continued)
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Charles philip Chan, 2008/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Tim X, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity,
Phil Carmody <=
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Paul R, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Andrea Vettorello, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Richard Riley, 2008/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs's popularity, Phil Carmody, 2008/12/16