[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: obarray
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: obarray |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:47:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>> CL or not, I get the same situation (what I can
>> see), the symbol *does* end up in obarray, and that
>> second part (setf or set) - what is that supposed to
>> do? What I can see it doesn't change the value,
>
> (symbol-value uninterned-symbol)
>
> ==> bar
>
> Note that we are not speaking about the symbol
> uninterned-symbol, which is in obarray, but about its
> value, which is another symbol that is not in
> obarray, has name "foo", and now a value of bar. We
> made that uninterned symbol the value of another
> interned symbol because we can't refer to an
> uninterned symbol directly in a program.
Right. Chrystal clear. This answers most of the
questions in my previous post, I think, although don't
hesitate to elaborate (as always). I'm very
appreciative of this.
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: obarray, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/17
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
Re: obarray, jack-mac, 2013/12/17