[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: obarray
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: obarray |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 2013 18:42:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
> It's a tradeoff. If you use uninterned symbols,
> debugging the macro is harder because you can't
> easily get the value of the temporaries.
OK.
> The name they chose is so unlikely that a collision
> will only happen if someone is doing it
> deliberately. We don't worry about such internally
> malicious code.
I agree a collision is extremely unlikely but on the
other hand, you do really have to spend time debugging
`dotimes'?
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: obarray, (continued)
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/14
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/17
- Re: obarray,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
Re: obarray, jack-mac, 2013/12/17