[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m question
From: |
Yuri Khan |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m question |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2022 13:08:44 +0700 |
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 05:51, Bob Newell <bobnewell@bobnewell.net> wrote:
> To summarize: sites which use "brotli" compression don't work;
> others do. There is no brotli handler in w3m.el, so I added
> one, and that did the trick.
After re-reading RFC 9110 § 12.5.3, it looks like the client should
indicate its supported and preferred content encodings in an
Accept-Encoding request header. Does w3m.el send one? If it doesn’t,
the server may assume any encoding is acceptable.
- Re: emacs-w3m question, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/06
- Re: emacs-w3m question,
Yuri Khan <=
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/08
Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/02