[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m question
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m question |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Nov 2022 13:34:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor wrote:
>> After re-reading RFC 9110 § 12.5.3, it looks like the
>> client should indicate its supported and preferred content
>> encodings in an Accept-Encoding request header. Does w3m.el
>> send one? If it doesn’t, the server may assume any encoding
>> is acceptable.
>
> Really? That doesn't sound right. Shouldn't the server
> assume that only the simplest encodings can be used if the
> header is missing? That's the only safe choice, no?
The discussion can go either way but it's the safe choice
alright ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: emacs-w3m question, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/02
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Jon Fineman, 2022/11/03
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/06
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Stefan Monnier, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Yuri Khan, 2022/11/07
- Re: emacs-w3m question,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: emacs-w3m question, Emanuel Berg, 2022/11/08
Re: emacs-w3m question, Bob Newell, 2022/11/02