[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Omit vtbl for "interfaces"
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: Omit vtbl for "interfaces" |
|
Date: |
Mon, 07 May 2007 11:00:27 +0900 |
Scott Meyers <usenet@aristeia.com> writes:
> The class is abstract and has no meaningful virtual function
> implementations. There is no reason for this class to have a vtbl nor
> for its (implicit) constructors or its destructor to adjust the vptr,
Isn't the rtti info referred to via the vtbl?
-Miles
--
Any man who is a triangle, has thee right, when in Cartesian Space, to
have angles, which when summed, come to know more, nor no less, than
nine score degrees, should he so wish. [TEMPLE OV THEE LEMUR]